How to Answer "Tell Me About a Deal You've Been Following"

This question separates candidates who are genuinely passionate about financial markets from those going through the motions. Interviewers use it to test your ability to think like a banker—understanding strategic rationale, valuation considerations, and market dynamics. It also reveals whether you actively follow deal activity, which signals genuine interest in the profession.

The best answers demonstrate an analytical perspective, not just a summary of what happened. Anyone can recite deal terms from a press release; interviewers want to hear your thinking about why the deal makes sense and what the key considerations are.

What Interviewers Are Really Assessing

• Market awareness: Do you actively follow deal flow and capital markets activity?
• Strategic thinking: Can you articulate the buyer's rationale and the seller's motivation beyond surface-level explanations?
• Valuation intuition: Do you have a perspective on whether the price was fair and what drove the premium?
• Analytical depth: Can you identify the key risks, synergies, and execution challenges?
• Communication: Can you discuss complex transactions clearly and concisely?

How to Structure Your Answer

Cover five elements: (1) the deal basics—who, what, when, and the transaction value, (2) the strategic rationale from both buyer and seller perspectives, (3) the valuation and how it compares to precedent transactions or trading multiples, (4) your perspective on key risks or execution challenges, and (5) what you find most interesting about it and why.

Sample Answers by Career Level

Entry-Level Example

Situation: Summer analyst candidate discussing a recent M&A transaction. Answer: "I've been following Capital One's acquisition of Discover Financial for approximately $35 billion, announced in early 2024. What interests me most is the strategic logic: Capital One gains Discover's payment network, making it the only large U.S. bank to own its own card network alongside Visa and Mastercard. This vertical integration creates significant competitive advantages—lower interchange costs on their own card portfolio and the ability to attract other issuers to the Discover network. The premium of roughly 25% over Discover's pre-announcement trading price seems justified when you consider the network asset, which is nearly impossible to replicate organically. The key risk I'm watching is regulatory approval, given increased antitrust scrutiny of large bank mergers and the consumer protection implications of combining two top-ten card issuers. I find this deal fascinating because it represents a structural shift in the payments landscape rather than a typical scale-driven bank merger."

Mid-Career Example

Situation: Associate candidate providing deeper deal analysis. Answer: "I've been closely following the take-private of Juniper Networks by Hewlett Packard Enterprise for roughly $14 billion. The deal is compelling because it represents HPE's strategic bet that enterprise networking and cloud infrastructure are converging, and Juniper's AI-native networking technology fills a critical gap in HPE's portfolio. What I find analytically interesting is the valuation—the offer represented approximately 4x forward revenue and roughly 25x forward earnings, a significant premium to Juniper's recent trading range but arguably reasonable given Juniper's Mist AI platform and the strategic premium HPE should pay for technology it would take years to develop internally. I've been tracking the regulatory process particularly closely because the DOJ scrutiny of the deal raises interesting questions about market concentration in enterprise networking. From an advisory perspective, this deal is a case study in how strategic premiums can be justified when the target's technology is a genuine accelerant for the acquirer's platform strategy rather than a simple revenue add."

Senior-Level Example

Situation: VP candidate discussing a deal with nuanced market context. Answer: "I've been following the wave of energy transition M&A, particularly Chevron's proposed $53 billion acquisition of Hess Corporation. This deal is a masterclass in resource-driven M&A strategy—Chevron is primarily paying for Hess's 30% stake in the Stabroek block offshore Guyana, which represents one of the most significant oil discoveries of the past decade. The valuation is interesting to deconstruct: if you strip out Hess's conventional assets at market multiples, the implied value for the Guyana position suggests Chevron is paying a meaningful premium but gaining decades of low-cost production that improves its portfolio positioning against peers. The complication I find most instructive is ExxonMobil's pre-emption claim and the resulting arbitration, which introduces deal certainty risk that would significantly impact how I'd structure advisory fees and termination provisions. This type of contested transaction is where advisory value is highest because the strategic, legal, and financial considerations are deeply intertwined."

Common Mistakes to Avoid

• Summarizing without analyzing: Reciting deal terms from a press release without offering your own perspective on the strategic rationale or valuation suggests you're not thinking like a banker.
• Picking a deal you can't defend: If you can't answer follow-up questions about the valuation, competitive dynamics, or risks, you've undermined your credibility rather than strengthened it.
• Ignoring the broader market context: Deals don't happen in isolation. Connecting your deal to broader M&A trends, regulatory environment, or capital markets conditions shows sophisticated thinking.

Practice This Question

Ready to practice your answer with real-time AI feedback? Try Revarta's interview practice to get personalized coaching on your delivery, structure, and content.